I copied and pasted my arguments earlier, to see what they say. But I'm still definitely leaning towards them. I'm not sure of Adam, still, but he's answered... Mi- not particularly informatively but plausibly enough that I can't think of what else to attack on.
With Adam, I just . . . I think if he were a wolf, he'd be more engaged? Especially in a game like this where it's a learning experience for at least half of the players involved.
It all seems like it's too little, too late? If that makes sense. Like he's retroactively trying to make his team's previous actions make sense, which— his logic seems sound until you actually look at his actions and then it starts to crumble.
no subject
Looks like this is it. Thanks for trusting us.
no subject
It's been a good game.
no subject
So . . . Satoshi and Boyue? It's really looking like it is them, despite the last minute logic Boyue pulled out.
no subject
no subject
no subject
[shrugs] It's not a sure vote, but it's about as much as we're ever going to get short of surety, I'd say.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject